Understanding the Dog Owners’ Liability Act in Ontario: A Framework for Dog Attacks and Compensation

Have questions about the article below, been attacked by a dog or have Dog Owners' Liability Act questions?
Click here to ask a question for free or report a Dog Attack here.

Dog ownership brings immense joy and companionship. However, even the most beloved canine can pose a threat. The Dog Owners’ Liability Act (DOLA) is a crucial piece of legislation in Ontario that safeguards public safety and offers recourse to victims of dog attacks. This article delves into the core principles of the DOLA, explaining strict liability, the definitions of “bite” and “attack,” and the types of damages covered.

The Principle of Strict Liability: The Cornerstone of the DOLA

Unlike negligence-based lawsuits where the plaintiff must prove the owner’s carelessness, the DOLA enforces strict liability. This means dog owners are held financially responsible for any injuries or damages caused by their dog’s bite or attack, regardless of the dog’s breed, prior behavior, or the owner’s knowledge. This shift in responsibility empowers victims. They are not required to delve into the owner’s past actions or intent, but rather focus solely on the dog’s attack and the resulting harm.

Strict Liability: A Rationale for Public Safety

The DOLA prioritizes public safety by recognizing the inherent dangers posed by dogs. Strict liability incentivizes responsible ownership. Knowing they are financially liable for any harm their dog inflicts, owners are more likely to take precautions such as proper training, leashing in public spaces, and secure enclosures on private property. This focus on responsible ownership helps minimize the risk of dog attacks.

Exceptions to Strict Liability: Limited Defenses for Dog Owners

The DOLA outlines limited exceptions to strict liability. If the injured person was trespassing on private property with no lawful excuse, or if they were provoking the dog in a way that would have caused a reasonable dog to attack, the owner might have a partial defense. However, the onus remains on the owner to prove these exceptions. These exceptions acknowledge situations where the victim’s own actions may have contributed to the attack.

What Constitutes a “Bite” or “Attack” under the DOLA?

The DOLA applies to situations involving bites or attacks by a dog. While the terms seem straightforward, legal interpretations provide more clarity:

  • Bite Definition: The DOLA doesn’t explicitly define “bite.” Courts generally interpret it broadly, encompassing any breaking of the skin by the dog’s teeth. This includes punctures, tears, or lacerations.
  • Beyond Bites: Recognizing Other Forms of Attacks: The DOLA extends beyond bites. Injuries from scratches, knockdowns, or being struck by a dog can all be considered attacks if they result in harm. For instance, a large dog jumping on a person and knocking them down, causing a broken bone, would likely be considered an attack under the DOLA.
  • Intention vs. Result: Focus on the Outcome: The owner’s intent is irrelevant. Even a playful dog’s actions that cause injury can be deemed an attack under the DOLA. If a large, overly enthusiastic dog jumps up on a child, knocking them down and causing a head injury, the owner would likely be held liable despite the dog’s playful intent.

Navigating Damages under the DOLA

A successful claim under the DOLA entitles the victim to compensation for various damages:

  • Medical Expenses: This includes past and future medical costs associated with treating the injuries from the attack. Bills from doctors, specialists, hospitals, and rehabilitation facilities would all be considered.
  • Lost Wages: Compensation for income lost due to missed work or reduced earning capacity because of the attack. Documentation such as pay stubs and doctor’s notes regarding missed work are crucial for establishing lost wages.
  • Pain and Suffering: Compensation for physical and emotional distress caused by the attack and its aftermath. The severity of the physical injuries, along with psychological trauma and emotional distress, are all factors considered when determining compensation for pain and suffering.
  • Scarring and Disfigurement: Compensation for permanent physical consequences of the attack. This could include scarring, loss of function, or other physical alterations caused by the dog attack.

The amount of compensation awarded depends on the severity of the attack and the resulting damages. Keeping detailed medical records, receipts for medications, and proof of lost wages strengthens a claim.

Understanding the Scope of the Dog Owners’ Liability Act

The DOLA applies to various dog-related situations:

  • Breeds Don’t Matter: Strict liability applies regardless of the dog’s breed. The focus is on the dog’s actions and resulting injuries, not its pedigree. A common misconception is that only certain breeds are subject to the DOLA. This is not the case.
  • Location of the Attack: The DOLA generally applies to attacks on public or private property, with some exceptions.

Have questions about the article above, been attacked by a dog or have Dog Owners' Liability Act questions?
Click here to ask a question for free or report a Dog Attack here.